Will AI replace Social Scientists and Related Workers, All Other?

All social scientists and related workers not listed separately. The percentage shown is a task-exposure model, not a prediction of certain job loss.

O*NET 30.3 · 19-3099.00 · modeled exposure, not guaranteed job loss

LOW TASK EXPOSURE

23%

Estimated share of representative tasks exposed to current AI capabilities.

Last updatedAugust 20, 2026

Evidence confidenceMedium

Browse this risk tierLower exposure jobs →

Category#

Healthcare

Clinical & Care

Modeled pay midpoint$

$67,100/yr

Directional estimate — verify locally

Time until impact⌁

6–10+ years

Earliest 2032 · widespread 2036+

Task-level replaceability ⓘ

Representative tasks ranked from highest to lowest AI exposure.

◇Organize role-specific information and routine work33%

✦Clinical accountability and hands-on care26%

⚙Prepare standard outputs and records22%

✦Patient trust and complex diagnosis22%

Impact timeline ⓘ

How AI assistance may move from early support to wider adoption.

2032Next2036+

Light supportAI provides limited help with organize role-specific information and routine work.

AugmentationTools improve productivity without owning outcomes.

Human-ledCore work stays anchored in clinical accountability and hands-on care.

6–10+ yearsdirectional confidence window

HOW AI CHANGES THIS JOBtyping the logic in plain English

01>Start with the real work done by Social Scientists and Related Workers, All Other.

02>AI can help with: Organize role-specific information and routine work.

03>If a task is repetitive and easy to check, AI pressure goes up.

04>But a person is still needed for: Clinical accountability and hands-on care.

05>Likely result: AI mostly acts as a helper while the core job stays human-led.

06>Important: 23% is estimated task exposure—not a 23% chance of losing the job.

What AI can do

Organize role-specific information and routine workLOW MATCH

Prepare standard outputs and recordsLOW MATCH

How estimates work →

Your human moat

◆

Clinical accountability and hands-on care

HIGH MOAT

Combined with patient trust and complex diagnosis, this keeps a human in the loop.

Strength9.5

Similar-role comparison

RoleRisk

Social Scientists and Related Workers, All Other23%

Chemical Technicians23%

Research Scientist22%

Nuclear Technicians22%

Why this score?

✓The model evaluates 2 representative core tasks.

✓The core work depends on presence, dexterity, or accountability.

✓Occupation and task language comes from O*NET 30.3.

✓The strongest human advantage is clinical accountability and hands-on care.

Research basis

O*NET 30.3 occupation tasks plus the ILO 2025 exposure framework. Scores are directional estimates.

Read ILO research →

← back to the job list

Explore safer adjacent careers

These roles are in Healthcare and have lower modeled task exposure. Transferability depends on your skills, location, and qualifications.

Genetic Counselors8% exposure Nurse Anesthetists8% exposure Nurse Midwives8% exposure

Career Pivot Brief early access →

Track this job’s risk score

Join the update list for Social Scientists and Related Workers, All Other. We will only email when this report materially changes.

Sponsor this job report →